Spirit Of Cricket

Hello.

England annihilated Team India for the second test match in a row and the margin was bigger this time. We are now 2-0 down in the four-Test series. If we fail to narrow the gap in the next two Tests, we will lose our status as the No 1 Test team in the world. The immediate question is: who is responsible for the twin defeats? It is not so difficult pointing the fingers at the captain, the players and the BCCI.

Only Rahul Dravid and Praveen Kumar have so far impressed me on this tour. Their effort is visible but other players throw it away. Batsmen have played poor shots and bowlers have bowled wrong lengths which has also been coupled with incorrect field placing. I remember making a point in my previous blog that Sehwag was right in playing out IPL till his team had chances of making it to semis and then requesting BCCI to not consider him for less important Carribean tour. I was so wrong. I was then thinking he will make a great impact on the England tour but he has certainly gone amiss. But now his just healed shoulders have even more burden to bear and try to lift the gloomy Indian camp to some sort of success in 3rd test at Edgbaston. Undeniably, so far England have been a better batting and bowling unit than us in these two games.

Now after 2001 test matches I am still trying to figure out what in the name of Holy Lake does the phrase "in the true spirit of cricket" mean?

Dhoni's decision to allow Ian Bell to bat again - after he was adjudged run-out at the stroke of tea - is in the spirit of the game. Going by the letter of the law, once umpires have ruled a batsman out and batsman has already crossed the ropes, he cannot be asked to bat again. But just for the sake of booing crowd and receiving private request from the Strauss and Flower, MS Dhoni rescinded his appeal and allowed Bell to bat after tea. Not surprisingly MS Dhoni received universal applause but lost a tactical advantage. MSD did well to avoid any controversy this time. Anything else would have soured the tour and cricketing ties between the two nations. More importantly, his decision has allowed Team India to stand on high moral ground. What the English or the Aussies would have done in such a situation is irrelevant, India needs to set its own standards.

However the measuring stick should be same for all cricketers and all matches from now and past. I need to ask this how the media or anyone from ECB/ICC say anything about Michael Vaughan's Vaseline remark about V V S Laxman which threatened to ruin the game's spirit. In the 1st test, Kevin Pietersen was supposedly out before he even scored 50, but after scoring a double century he said Dravid is a saint-like figure who didn't even appeal for the catch. KP's conscience must have known he was out and he should have walked, instead he waited in respect of the "spirit of cricket." In the just concluded West Indies tour VVS Laxman was given stumped out when he was just trying to regain his balance after the ball appeared to be dead. India has been in many controversies in high profile overseas tours - Ball tampering & Mike Procter issue in South Africa, Bhajji-Symonds Monkeygate in Australia, Jelly beans incident involving Zaheer Khan and Ian Bell in last England series and numerous ways of sledging that has taken place when Indian team has looked in strong positions. Had Dhoni not taken his appeal back, I am sure this case would have gone to ICC courts and then all cricket experts would have said BCCI has used its financial power once again to influence the decision in their favor.

This incident is just another example of the double standards that Team India has to put up with in what still remains a white man's game. It is high time we put our foot down. Dhoni should have stuck to his appeal despite the English crowd's jeers. Team India should not be subject to double standards, nor should it try to uphold a brown man's burden. Instead we should play the game as hard as the English or Aussies play it.

Cheers until next time... :)